Part 3 · Operate
Person intel
What somebody has said in public, with sources, refreshed on a cadence.
01What it is
Public statements by a person, stored with sources and dates, gathered by the research agent and refreshed on a schedule rather than on every view.
02Why it exists
The difference between a message that lands and one that does not is often a single specific thing the recipient said in public. Finding it by hand takes twenty minutes per person.
The caps exist because this is the most expensive thing per person in the product. Refreshing on every page view would cost more than the outreach returns.
03How to use it
- 01Open a person and read what has been found.
- 02Expect "nothing public found" on plenty of people. That is an honest answer.
- 03Note that a recent touch triggers a shorter refresh, so somebody you just wrote to gets re-checked sooner.
04What good looks like
- You give it
- A person who posts about their work under their own name.
- You get
- Several dated public statements with links, usable as a specific reference in a draft.
- Why
- The research agent searches the public web and stores what it finds with sources.
Derived from the rules in the code
05What weak looks like, and what it costs
- You give it
- A person with no public presence.
- You get
- Marked as nothing public found, and drafts fall back to company evidence.
- Why
- The alternative would be inventing something about them, which the grounding validator refuses.
Derived from the rules in the code