Trigify alternatives for founders: what to use after the shutdown

Which job were you using Trigify for?

Trigify did several jobs, and most teams leaned on one or two. The replacement depends on which, because no single tool below does all of them well. Find your row first, then read only the options in it.

What are the best Trigify alternatives?

Six tools, each checked on its own pricing page on 29 October 2026. A price is the entry point for the plan that does the job named, not the cheapest plan the vendor sells.

Teamfluence: the closest like-for-like

If the reason you paid for Trigify was a feed of the people engaging with LinkedIn posts, yours and other people’s, Teamfluence is built for that job. Its pricing page lists engagement on your posts, your team’s posts, competitors, influencers, keywords and ads, on one plan at 449€ a month with unlimited seats. It also offers Trigify customers price matching and a free migration, which is worth asking about before you rebuild anything by hand.

Octolens and Buska: keyword alerts across social

If you used Trigify mainly for keyword alerts, both of these watch public posts for your words. Octolens covers LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub and more, with webhooks and Slack alerts on every plan, from €139 a month billed annually. Buska starts at $49 a month for five signals with daily updates and Slack notifications; webhooks start on its $99 plan. Octolens suits a team that wants the feed in its own tools; Buska suits a founder on a tight budget.

Common Room and Clay: company signals and routing

Common Room is a full signal platform for teams with a sales function, from $2,500 a month billed annually, and lists job changes, website activity and community engagement on every plan. Clay is a table you build yourself: its Launch plan adds signals on job changes, promotions, new hires and company news, and its Growth plan lets any signal arrive by webhook. If you already had a Clay table fed by Trigify, Clay is where the new feed lands, whichever source you pick.

Zapier: the glue for broken automations

Zapier is not a signal source. It is how a new source reaches the CRM, sheet or Slack channel that Trigify used to fill. Its Catch Hook trigger gives a URL any tool can post to, and webhooks need the Professional plan from $19.99 a month.

Where does InstinctGTM fit, and where is it the wrong pick?

InstinctGTM is for a founder or a small team who wants the signal and the next step in one place. It imports your Trigify export, watches the companies you name for dated changes, such as hiring for the role you sell to, a pricing page rewritten, a funding round or a new product page, and when changes add up at one of them, drafts the message for you to approve with the evidence attached. People who engage with your own posts get a drafted note too, and every signal can go on to a Clay table or a Zap by signed webhook.

It is the wrong pick if you need the people on other people’s LinkedIn posts tracked automatically and at volume. It keeps only the people on your screen when you press Capture in its Sidecar extension, because we do not scrape LinkedIn and do not plan to. It also has no built-in social keyword monitoring, so a team whose setup was a keyword feed should look at Octolens or Buska first.

How do you choose in a week?

1. 01Name the job. Write one line: “Trigify told us X, and we used it to do Y.” Use the table at the top to find the two tools that do X.
2. 02Set a budget before you look at plans. Several of these price by volume, and a trial with no ceiling teaches you nothing about the bill.
3. 03Run both for one week on the same accounts or keywords. Count the signals you would have acted on, not the total.
4. 04Keep the one whose signals you acted on. Export from the other before its trial ends.